|
by Bruce Behrhorst
Every year the
Institute of Space Nuclear Power Studies at the University Of
New Mexico
puts on a three day conference called Space Technology &
Applications International Forum (STAIF-2004) early in February,
this year held at the Albuquerque Hilton Hotel. Discussions
ranging from conferences dealing with activities in thermo
physics in microgravity, commercial civil next generation space
transportation. Symposiums on space nuclear power and
propulsion, human space exploration colonialization, future
concepts, awards and exhibits.
When I arrived in Albuquerque the weather and cab drivers were
pleasant but after my first day there and hearing cabbies
complain about a five year drought that had descended upon the
city; I had my suspicions the weather would change. Coming from
South Florida I could sense moisture in the air and I would warn
them. There just might be a blizzard on the horizon, I said.
Most welcomed my prediction saying, "This would be some badly
needed relief from the parched landscape one sees." Suddenly the
next morning I looked out my hotel window to see the Sandia
Peaks dusted with snow and snow storms that had canceled most
businesses and school activities for that day north of the city.
Fortunately my access to STAIF 2004 conference was not
interrupted.
Arriving early and walking along the hotel hallway
I noticed what looked like a gigantic badminton shuttlecock
thinking ... I'd seen pictures in text books of the SNAP 10A
America's first working nuclear space reactor. Cool... Nice
trophy, would look good in my apartment only I began thinking
how stupid I'd look before airport security explaining merits
and the historical significance saying, "But dude...This was
America's first nuclear space reactor!" Yeah...Right, that dream
vanished over my head - quick!

SNAP
REACTOR
|
Further down the hallway was a
miniature scale model of the current design future
"JIMO" (Jupiter Icy Moon Orbiter) NASA's dynamic nuclear
reactor powered spacecraft. I padded my jacket pockets and
realized I left my camera in my room!
Had to run back to my room to
get it.
I snapped more than
enough pictures making sure I had imaged the 'indian arrowhead'
fashioned cooling radiators flanked on either side of a 20 meter
central truss to which converged at a power conversion unit and
heat exchanger, an extra section housed shielding and the
lightweight fast reactor. By far the largest square feet area of
the spacecraft structure devoted to cooling with the science
package, ion thrusters pods, radar arrays, boom and high/low
gain antennas making up the opposite end. Two large pods of
electrical ion thruster buttons set in tandem attached to
science platform. The planned Nuclear Electric Xenon Ion System
(Nexis) ion engine at the high-efficiency, high-power, and
high-thrust operating conditions needed for use in nuclear
electric propulsion applications is contemplated. It's designed
to process two metric tons of propellant, 10 times the
capability of the Deep Space 1 engine, and operate for 10 years,
two to three times the Deep Space 1 thruster lifespan.
Whatever 'brand' thruster is finally used you can expect
xenon gas blown out the back of electric thrusters at velocities
greater than 36,000 mph making this 150 foot plus long
spacecraft scream through Jupiter's moons Europa,Callisto and
Ganymede by the most
direct trajectory possible, no 2 or 3 planetary gravity
assists 'swing by' for this mission. Onboard fission power
systems involve about a 5 gallon wastebasket sized reactor
plenty of power in the hundreds of thousands of watts and a
reactor lifespan to go past approx.10 years. Plenty of Kw's
energy to operate Optic style communications for a science
platform.
Next were local High School and Middle School
exhibits of scale models very ingeniously crafted with household
implements like photographic film canisters, soft drink cans,
straws, tobacco smoke pipe stem cleaners, Legos etc. with
prepared explanations and printed outlines. This to give
attendees a feel for this year's theme "In-space assembly and
shuttle repair".
Welcoming open remarks
were given by outgoing Chair: Bonnie Dunbar of NASA Johnson
Space Center and incoming Chair: Robert Sackheim of NASA
Marshall Space Flight Center also Louis Caldera, President,
University of New Mexico and Joseph Cecchi: Dean, School of
Engineering, University of New Mexico.
Guest speaker Congressman R-Pennsylvania, Robert Walker spoke
about the need to establish future aerospace industries. He was
giving the audience the sense the country should not be
complacent in past leadership in robotic space achievement. And
the path ahead will be difficult with project Prometheus. Posing
a challenge to the nuclear space community to educate a
skeptical public short on knowledge about its potential
scientific merits, mission materials, launch and mission safety.
He later pointed to mold a focused plan to assist the commercial
sector with President George W. Bush: A
Renewed Spirit of Discovery budget announced earlier this
year as NASA plans to offer "Centennial Challenge Prizes" the
government version of the X-prize. He also made light of Foreign
governments and their space agencies who have vested interest in
space in lifting export control restrictions that hamper
technology transfer and by extension development shared cost
bearing.
Lastly he made reference to the lack of programs that reach
young people that inspire them to the value of space science and
engineering as a career choice later in life noting without an
ongoing replacement of current talent our space effort will
become more difficult.
Mr. Alan Newhouse ( Project Prometheus DOE/NASA
Project Manager) introduced
Project Prometheus to the conferees. He outlined the NASA
nuclear systems program in making strategic near and long term
nuclear electric power and propulsion a reality. In addition
Prometheus would insure development in the next generation of
Stirling Radioisotope Generator (SRG), multi-mission
Radioisotope Thermoelectric Generator(MMRTG) power systems, the
predecessors of which were used to power space science missions
for over 30 years. He described Prometheus as a safe and
reliable operation of a nuclear reactor-powered spacecraft on a
long duration proposed Jupiter Icy Moons Orbiter (JIMO) mission
. Prometheus would
incorporate launch safety scenarios and the different proposed
reactor types: Heatpipe, Liquid metal or Gas Cooled . I also
asked him about the possibility of using sea launch systems to
launch Project Prometheus missions. His reply, NASA does not
have policy with regard to sea launching and missions regarding
nuclear systems would follow in large part safety procedures
established by all previous successful nuclear materials
component ground launchings.
NASA published material touts fission power units
developing power production would be orders of magnitude far
greater than current radioisotope power systems to the tune of
3,4,5 hundred kWe as opposed to hundreds of watts using solar
electric. All this energy coming from a 5 gallon office
wastebasket sized reactor to power radar penetration of Jovian
moon subsoil from inches and feet to tens of kilometers into the
subsurface of moon Callisto, Ganymede and Europa in search of
liquid water. Improved cameras and spectrometers with greater
resolution (200 color vs. 7 colors, or less than 100m per pixel
vs.100km per pixel) to map nearly the entire surface of each
moon; and instruments to use lasers to measure the topography
of, or illuminate, extraterrestrial trial surfaces. This is
different to current missions where instruments are cycled on
and off because the nuclear-powered spacecraft would have the
capability to power all its science instruments simultaneously.
And the ability to adjust mission objectives and transmit
optically huge amounts of data.
Lastly, Mike Sanders of JPL quickly described the future
Mars science Lab (MSL) the next generation Mars Rover type.
These cost sensitive solutions would be an advantage over
present Rovers in missions described could in effect land any
where on the Mars planet; transmit optically in high bandwidth
mode, equipped with robust flight software, increased autonomous
operation designed for planetary protection measures land large
masses and improved overall instrumentation equipped with a
powerful 500 watt electrical RTG attached aft of the lab/rover.

SCHOOL AWARDS
|
Irene El-Genk and Jeff King presented the secondary school space
design competition. Winners were announced at close of Plenary
Sessions.
At the STAIF 2004 awards
Banquet the Schreiber-Spence Achievement Awards Recipient was
Dr. Robert W. Bussard of Energy/Matter conversion Corporation (EMC2)
as a young physicist hired by Oak Ridge to work on the nuclear
airplane of the period he also wanted to work on nuclear
rockets.
|

left to right:
Dr. Stanley Gunn (past recipient), Dr.
Robert Bussard, Dr. Gary Bennett. photo courtesy: Tom
Kessler (Boeing Phantom Works)
|
As one of the early Rover
Boys named for the project to build nuclear rockets, he also
would later published countless other abstracts that continues
to this day and historic books like, "Fundamentals of Nuclear
Flight" also his seminal article on interstellar fusion ramjet .
The Bussard system would use a "Ramscoop" to funnel charged
particles or ions from a wide cross-sectional area of onrushing
interstellar medium into the ship's fusion reactor. He pointed
out that for a starship mass of 1000 tons, an interstellar
proton density of 109/m3, and a 100%
efficient hydrogen fusion engine, the craft could accelerate
almost indefinitely at 1G. Starting out with a very low initial
velocity a few tens of Km's/second eventually the craft would
pick up speed enough to approach light speed within a year. If
there were ever a future interstellar spacecraft it would
involve the Bussard Ramjet System. In his closing remark from a
personal history perspective in 'Carpe Diem' manner he urged
young engineers working on current nuclear space projects to
seize the opportunity now before it should ever wane. At the
close of the awards Banquet David B. Lavery of the solar system
exploration NASA headquarters Washington D.C. Explained Mars
exploration Rover 2003 missions and the joint European-U.S. Mars
Express Mission and the latest downloads from Spirit and
Opportunity Rover findings from Mars.
The Industrial Exhibits
by Boeing company and its space team companies: Ball Aerospace &
Technologies, BWX Technologies, Rocketdyne are under contract on
ground-breaking initiatives for Project Prometheus in nuclear
electric, nuclear thermal propulsion and power such as fast
lightweight space reactor systems, fissile fuels, imaging, optic
communications. Lockheed Martin Space Systems Company manifests
the SP 100 space reactor at 100Kw electrical various RTG's, Hall
and various other ion thrusters and Stardust spacecraft. General
Atomics, NASA JSC Human Research Facility with Biomedical
Hardware based on the International Space Station, Northrop
Grumman Space Technology Chandra x-ray spacecraft, Stirling
Technology, Oak Ridge National Laboratories, Sandia National
Laboratories, Swales Aerospace temperature control systems, NASA
Stennis Space Center Sunpower Inc. solar power systems and NASA
Project Prometheus/JIMO with two composite foam to scale liquid
cool and heatpipe type reactors nicely colored.
SOLAR SYSTEM NOT A
VACANT LOT
Suddenly at the center
of the exhibit room stood the "Step aside ET here come the
Humans" exhibit put on by the NASA Glenn Research Center
entitled:
Bimodal Nuclear Thermal Rocket Propulsion, "Credible Space
Transportation for the 21st Century". Oh my God...If this system
ever came to pass it would be the culmination of all the hard
work that has ever been put together since the first days of the
nuclear thermal rocket program of yester year. I have to admit
this is ambitious - loved it.
Briefly
described it involves a human split/sprint mission approach and
predeployment of surface and orbital cargo elements followed by
a piloted Mars voyage 500 day, rated at 6 to 7 month 1-way
transit to Mars . The added safety feature is in the event of a
major mission abort 'blowout' due some malfunction forcing
astronauts to return they could beeline back to Earth in
relative comfort in artificial gravity. The propulsive system is
to use a 'Bimodal' Nuclear Thermal Rocket (NTR) with a high
specific Impulse in the 850's to 1000 seconds and
thrust-to-weight ratio at 3 -10. The main reason has to do with
the near minuscule U235
fissile fuel consumed during the primary propulsion maneuvers of
a typical Mars mission engines configured to burn LH2
for both propulsive thrust and modest power generation thus the
term (bimodal). The advantage as explained is because it reduces
thermal stress on the reactor (in a preheated state) because it
minimizes large thermal cycling, no prolonged 'cold soaking'
engine and it allows for rapid reactor restart, and reduces
'decay heat' propellant loss by rejecting 'afterheat' from the
power system's space radiator. During the power generation phase
the bimodal engine's reactor core operates in essentially 'idle
mode' with a thermal power output at 110 Kw thermal. The energy
generated within the reactor fuel assemblies is removed using a
variety of 'close Loops' concept (like core support tie tubes or
integrated energy extraction ducts within the individual fuel
assemblies) then shunted to a turboalternator compressor Brayton
power converter unit employing helium/xenon working fluid a
common pump-loop radiator systems rejects system waste heat and
is also available to help remove low level decay heat following
high thrust engine operation.
The core stage would entail three 15,000 pound force (kilopound
force) thrusters. The Bimodal BNTR's supplies 50 Kw
electrical power for crew life support and active refrigeration
systems to prevent 'stale' boiloff of liquid H2. On
the piloted side CTV (Crew Transport Vehicle) the bimodal NTR
'core' stage is connected to the inflatable "TransHab" crew
module via an innovative, spine-like 'saddle truss'
approximately 22 meters in length which is open underneath to
allow easy jettisoning of the 'in-line' Liquid H2 propellant tank following the Trans-Mars injection (TMI) burn.
The CTV and the whole spacecraft then begins a tumble (rotate)
at 4 revolutions per minute (RPM) to provide artificial gravity
this prepares the TransHab crew with a Mars gravity field of
0.38 GE (G gravitational constant) outbound leg . On
the return leg a 6 (RPM) rotation would provide 0.8 GE
to assist in again acclimatize the crew to Earth's gravity after
their 500 day stay at Mars. The team at Glenn assure us that
fewer transportation system elements are needed and simpler
mission operation dynamics when compared to chemical or Solar
electric propulsion (SEP) options. They also have a wickedly
straight forward
Cargo and Hab Mars Lander descent stage which uses four 22
klbf burning LOX/LCH4 and uses "In-Situ" production
of LOX/LCH4. For ascent propellant uses
Earth-supplied LH2 + Mars Co2.
As far as critics that point to
Coriolis forces effects as a negative human effect ...it's
nothing humans can't be trained to cope with.
The team even found a
way to Earth ground launch with a Shuttle-derived heavy lift
capacity vehicle something NASA needs to do quickly if they're
ever to set an agenda at LEO. In addition they have a Moon
version for lunar missions. They also urge NASA to invest wisely
and can't afford to waste funds on developing "Short shelf life"
technologies to conduct a few "See we can do it " missions. They
express concern that NASA maybe misleading the public by hyping
"Sci-Fi" technologies that suck badly needed funds from
"Credible" technologies that will carry astronauts out beyond
LEO. Hmm...I like the focus of this team!
But I still wondered
about one small piece missing on Mars descent plan. I noticed
plans ditch what little is left of any aerodynamics wingless
aerobraked lander heat shield cover which revels a 4 point
landing pod vehicle. I understand that Mars has little
atmospheric density but it does have some and maybe a folded 250
wing span with a three point sled vehicle could help make a
horizontal piloted landing on a 'dozer rover' prepared landing
strip help save mission mass. Since the latest Spirit rover
'dig' images seem like ideal Mars ground for a 'dozer rover' to
smooth out in any case, maybe it could happen on later missions
to Mars depending on future soil structure studies.
The technical programs
were a non-stop 'Round Robbin' affair of NASA Administrators,
managers, individual scientists and engineers representing
national and foreign public, private concerns working in
different aspects of the space field in areas such as:
materials, thermal control issues two phase and single phase,
refractory metal system design manufacturing and fabrication,
marketing, finance and insurance, space tourism, fusion space
systems and applications, human/robotics exploration strategies
and architectures, heatpipe technology, far term propulsion
concepts and technologies, transformational systems concepts and
technologies-nearer term needs, orbital space plane program,
fuels processing quality safety and storage for nuclear and
non-nuclear, emerging radiation health-risk mitigation
technologies, Safety analysis and launch approval process, Space
Elevator and StarTram ground launch strategies. Space fission
system test effectiveness, Spacecraft Rad hard electronics
system design. Just to name a few. For
a full program
link to.
I attended a few of the
presentations some of particular interest was an overview of
Human/Robotic Exploration Strategies and Architectures. The
presenter: John Mankins, NASA Headquarters, Washington DC. Spoke
about the change in
national space policy and how it relates to human and
robotic technology concepts activities of the future.
The policy essentially is in the country's national
interest and sets the fundemental goal of space exploration is
to advance U.S. scientific,security and economic interests and
the central theme would be a robust space exploration program
can accomplish this goal. This is not predicated on any past
"President Kennedy Type" pronouncement of going to the Moon, or
a single premise like the international space station project,
or in the context of a bipolar world competing superpower
struggle (old adage that Bureaucracy loves crisis) and it's not
about prestige or the science. It is about setting ambitious
goals in space exploration and this falls in as a national
policy interest.
To extent Human and Robotic exploration not Human vs.
Robots, presence over the solar system and beyond. It does have
a human component to it to extend human presence over the solar
system in the long term as an objective of U.S. Policy with a
finite goal though not at a 'breakneck' pace by the year 2020 in
preparation of the human exploration of Mars and other
destinations. And lastly to develop the innovative technologies
and infrastructures both to explore and to support the decisions
about destinations for human exploration for both national and
international participation in exploration with the supporting
rational; in order to further U.S. security and economic
interests is a powerful policy.
Clearly NASA will not
abandon its commitments to the ISS, instead hoping to work with
the international space community of nations in the exploration
of the solar system and beyond. Ground launching will see a
commitment to separate crews from cargo, vigorous moon missions
will serve as test bed for systems use in further destinations
also increased commercial participation was noted. Meanwhile
robotic exploration will continue unabated and a commitment for
Shuttle return to flight.
Personally, my view is the
agency would like to make the public confident that it has a
future plan and it realizes it has to prepare itself and
convince the public it will make it into a reality in the long
run.
TRAVEL TO SIGHTS IN
ALBUQUERQUE
Later that week I
dropped by the University of New Mexico campus and visited the
Science and Engineering Library collection of antique radios and
amplifiers. Then went to the Institute of Meteoritics and its
Meteorite Museum. This was a shocking experience to see what
looks like an innocuous rock the size of a golf cart under a
plexiglass dome all lit up be a, Enstatite Achondrite meteorite
the second largest stone meteorite in the world - and it hit
Norton County, Kansas. Isn't that were Dorothy's house was
lifted to the land of Oz ? The story goes it was caused by a
tornado. Could it be it was this monster meteorite that blasted
the house to Oz? But seriously, these space objects are
discussed among scientist about how and under what conditions
our solar system was formed.
I finally ended my trek
past Albuquerque's Old Town by the Albuquerque Museum and the
new home of the National
Atomic Museum soon to become the
National Museum of Nuclear Science and History the new
museum will allow the museum to expand its exhibits and
programming to include atomic time keeping and the atomic clock,
nuclear space, secrets of the southwest, renewable energy, food
irradiation, robotics, NERVA and nuclear propulsion. The new
site will also have an extensive outdoor exhibit park displaying
a B-29, F-105 jet, Redstone Rocket, Atomic Annie cannon, and the
James K. Polk submarine sail. The new facility is scheduled to
open in late 2006.
As the old saying goes, never had a vacation I didn't like; I
can say that 'cause I hadn't had one in over twenty years. Maybe
if I get lucky and I get to go again then maybe I'll get to see
that NERVA/ROVER nuclear space rocket museum exhibit or maybe
email someone somewhere in the solar system on solid ground
other than here - that would be cool !
Sources:
James A. Dewar, To The End Of
The Solar System, 2004
S. Borowski, L. Dudzinski and
M.McGuire, Bimodal Nuclear Thermal Rocket (NTR) Propulsion for
Power-Rich, Artificial Gravity Human Exploration Missions to
Mars. IAA-01-IAA.13.3.05, 2001
Photo: Bimodal Nuclear Thermal
Rocket Propulsion courtesy NASA (for more information contact:
Stanley.K.Borowski@nasa.gov)
Bimodal Nuclear Thermal Rocket
Propulsion, Blueprint for 21st Century space travel, Glenn
Research Center NASA, http://stpo.grc.nasa.gov (website content
under construction)
Project Prometheus the Nuclear
System Program.
For a copy: Space Technology
and Applications International Forum-STAIF 2004, Editor, Mohamed
S. El-Genk, AIP Conference
Proceedings Volume 699.
|